|
Helping
the Disabled in an Emergency
Steven A. Adelman
When I first got involved in venue
safety litigation, much of my focus was on mosh pits. One night I got a call
from an older friend who had recently retired. After marveling at my stories of
concert mayhem, she remarked that I was dealing with completely different issues
than at the high culture events she attended. "Oh really?" I said.
My friend is a patron of classical music
and modern dance. In order to be close to the action, she and her husband sit in
center orchestra seats, a few rows from the stage. If she has ever been to a
rock concert or a general admission event, I have not heard about it. She was
blissfully unaware of concepts like occupant load, sufficiency of egress, exit
lighting, and usher training. So, in the interest of enlightenment, I posed some
questions.
First, I asked about the people sitting
near her at a typical performance. "Older or younger?" I asked. "Older," my
friend replied. "Do any of them use canes or walkers, or just move slowly?" "Most of them," she lamented.
"And these are the people sitting on both sides of
your center orchestra seats?" "Uh, yes," my friend answered, waiting for the
catch. "So in an emergency, you would have to either climb over these people or
wait for them to get out of your way, right?" My friend's response was
unprintable.
Warming to my educational mission, I
shifted gears. "Let's say you got out of your row without incident -- where would
you go?" Rallying, my friend confidently replied, "The exit, of course." I lured
my prey with another easy question. "You know where the exits are?" "Certainly,"
she replied. She and her husband are very good about checking for the nearest
exit signs. "So if the way you came in was blocked, you would know another way
to leave the building?" "Yes," she said, now a bit uneasily. "Besides the main
entrance, do you know where any other exits would take you?" Uh-oh, another long
pause. "No." "Do you know if you'd have to go behind the stage or down any
stairs, or whether there is emergency lighting?" Again, "No." "How would you
find out?" My friend brightened another easy question. "Why, I'd follow an
usher!" "Those ushers -- older or younger than you?"
Suddenly my friend realized that we were
talking about the same crowd situations after all, but with different audiences.
Which scared the hell out of her.
There can be crowd crushes without mosh
pits, people falling down without being drunk, patrons behaving irrationally in
their golden years as much as in their callow youth. Despite the incredible
diversity of public assembly facilities, the legal standard of care is always to
do what a "reasonable person" would in the same or similar circumstances. The
challenge is to decide what is reasonable at any given event.
Here are a few places to begin assessing
your facility's preparedness to handle an emergency involving people with
disabilities.
Code compliance. All facilities should
meet the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act, as well as
applicable fire and building codes. These contain minimum standards for
accessibility, egress, and emergency lighting, all issues of heightened
importance when dealing with disabled people. At the very least, you should
periodically have your facility inspected for compliance with applicable codes
and regulations.
Some vulnerabilities, however, are
harder to reduce than others. For example, many treasured opera houses and
symphony halls are necessarily riskier facilities. High culture performance
tends to attract a disproportionate number of elderly and disabled patrons, and
"grandfather clauses" often exempt older buildings from current safety codes.
Likewise, hastily-erected local fairs
present an astonishing array of risks even to able-bodied people. Providing
adequate space for crowd movement and clear signage is a challenge at every open
space venue. Add in the chaotic nature of most fairs, particularly with
nighttime lighting and noise, and reasonable egress becomes a serious liability
problem.
Emergency plan. Every facility should
have an emergency plan that reflects the realities of the target demographic.
But the fact that a plan exists is hardly the end of the legal obligation to
your guests. A plan for which the staff is inadequately trained is virtually an
admission that the facility has not met its own standard of care.
Training is essential, and the venue's
potential liability is the same whether the ushers are paid professionals or
volunteers. In legal terms, if volunteer staff will not learn and practice your
emergency plan, then the venue may not reasonably count on their help.
Know your audience. It is important to
have adequate space for wheelchair patrons, but you also need people available
to get them out of the building in an emergency, or to a nearby shelter in place
if no safe exit is possible. Lighting of stairs and exits becomes particularly
important where people tend to be visually impaired. Clear, frequent public
address announcements from a person with authority are vital, particularly where
members of the audience may need extra help or time deviating from their usual
routine.
Test your plan. The only way to be sure
you have managed these risks is to test your emergency plan, either in real time
or at least with a tabletop exercise involving your key staff. The more
literal-minded you get, the more you will identify gaps in either the plan
itself or in your ability to implement it.
The International Association of
Assembly Managers has tools to help. At IAAM's Academy for Venue Safety &
Security, we teach a risk assessment formula, R=VxTxC (Risk equals
Vulnerability times Threat times Consequences). For example, consider the risk
created by disabled patrons at an older opera house. The vulnerability is the
audience itself, which, in its own way, may require as much attention as
teenagers at a rock concert. Reasonably foreseeable threats might include
medical emergencies, people needing help moving through a relatively
inaccessible building, or an inability to understand announcements. The
consequences, particularly to an already fragile population, can be dire.
The Vulnerability Identification Self
Assessment Tool ("ViSAT"), which IAAM developed in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, takes the user through myriad risk
scenarios to apply the R=VxTxC formula. While it is valuable for any
facility to engage in this analysis, it is particularly important for venues
that attract vulnerable patrons.
As a matter of law, the more foreseeable
a risk, the greater the venue's duty to prevent that risk from having disastrous
consequences. The risks of hosting disabled patrons are different, if not
necessarily greater, than for other audiences. Any venue that ignores these
differences does so at its own risk. |